New Jersey Contract Attorneys Tag Archives

Published on: February 8, 2025

New Jersey Appeals Court Gives 337,214 Reasons Not to Delay in Disputing Commercial Invoices

New Jersey business law enforces both oral and written contracts for the delivery of goods and services. However, in the case of Pantos USA, Inc. v. MindsInSync, Inc., when disputes arise, a New Jersey appeals court once again emphasized that evidence is king. NJ_State_House-300x200

Background

In 2018, Pantos USA, Inc., provided “freight forwarding, logistics and warehousing services” to MindsInSync, Inc., Choice Select Home Textiles, In., Ideas From the Ground Up, Inc., and 101 Home Textile Creations, Inc. When they did not pay, Pantos sued them in the Law Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey. The defendants denied that there was a written contract, and claimed that Pantos’s services were unsatisfactory.

Published on: September 21, 2017

Void Contracts, Voidable Contracts and Severability under New Jersey Contract Law

by Maurice W. McLaughlin

New Jersey business law allows people and businesses to manage their relationships by entering contracts which define the terms of that relationship. Contracts are enforceable by the full force of the law. For instance, if one party owes another money under a contract but doesn’t pay, the wronged party can go to court; if it can prove its case the court will enter a judgment in its favor and it can then have the county sheriff go seize the breaching party’s property to pay the debt.

In some cases, all or part of a contract may not be enforceable. This area of New Jersey business law contains three distinct and important concepts: void contracts, voidable contracts, and severability.

Void Contracts or Contract Provisions

Published on: June 23, 2017

New Jersey’s Statue of Frauds Limits Oral Contracts

by Maurice W. McLaughlin

handshake-2056023__340-300x200 As a general rule, oral contacts in New Jersey are enforceable – not that they are recommended; indeed. Our attorneys, we always recommend that contracts be in writing because they are easier to prove and leave less room for misunderstandings. However, if you can prove the terms of an oral contract New Jersey courts will generally enforce it.

A big exception applies to this, however, in the Statute of Frauds. Under the New Jersey Statute of Frauds, courts will refuse to enforce certain oral contracts even if you can prove them. This law is based on the premise that oral contracts are inherently less reliable, and writings in certain situations are necessary to prevent perjury or unfounded claims. The Statute of Frauds has its roots in the old Statute for the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries which was adopted by the English Parliament in 1677, and was thus the law in England’s American Colonies when they became independent. The main elements of the Statute of Frauds are found in one section of New Jersey Statutes, but other elements are spread in different sections of Chapter 25 of Title 2A of New Jersey Statutes.

The main types of contracts which the Statute of Frauds requires to be in writing are: