New Jersey Real Estate Law Decision Examines Difference Between Analysis of Adverse Possession and Proscriptive Easements
It’s easy to think that under New Jersey real estate law, “squatter’s rights” is a thing of the past. However, it is very much alive, although very difficult to prove. There are two similar ways to obtain an interest in property owned by another, through either adverse possession or a prescriptive easement. While the requirements for each are similar are similar, they are still different. These requirements were recently examined in a New Jersey appeals court decision in the case of Shea vs DiPopolo.
Kenneth and Catherine Ann Shea purchased a home on Columbia Turnpike in Florham Park, New Jersey in 2003. The survey showed that their horseshoe shaped driveway, both ends of which connect to Columbia Turnpike, ran onto the edge of the neighboring property. The Shea’s house was built in 1981, and aerial photographs show that the driveway was in use and going over the neighbor’s property since at least April 19, 1990. It was originally gravel, but the Sheas paved it between 2005 and 2007. They .used it until 2021 when their neighbors Romo and Dolores DiPopolo, sent a letter telling them to stop using it and then put a fence up barring their access.
The DiPopolos bought the neighboring property in 2001. It vacant until they built a house there and moved into it in 2016. The DiPopolos also owned the property behind it. They developed that property in 2004 and 2005, using the disputed driveway – which ran on both properties – to move the construction equipment used in the development.
New Jersey Lawyers Blog



Tax”. Pursuant to the prior legislation, adopted in 2004, residential properties and certain commercial properties which sold for over $1 million in New Jersey were subject to a “Mansion Tax” which required the buyers of the real estate to pay 1 percent of the purchase price to the State of New Jersey.
differences.
Montclair State University has spent the last decade or so trying to obtain approval from the County of Passaic and the City of Clifton to construct a roadway which would intersect with a county road. Both the County and the City raised concerns about the proposed development and Montclair State made significant efforts in an attempt to address those concerns. In 2014, Montclair State submitted an application to Passaic County for a permit to install traffic controls at the intersection.
The short answer is: yes.
Recently, many people who are purchasing real property have been reluctant to spend the money to obtain a survey of the property they are purchasing. However, in most circumstances it is obtaining a survey is vitally important and it is money well spent. Also, if the purchaser is financing the purchase with a mortgage loan, the lender will almost always require a survey before closing.