Background: Anti-Discrimination Statutes and the Background Circumstances Rule
Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination both prohibit employers from illegally discriminating against their employees. Normally the evaluation is straightforward under the McDonnell Douglas Test. However, in the case of reverse discrimination, i.e., where an employer is accused of discriminating against an employee who is in the majority, New Jersey and
many Federal courts imposed a higher burden of proof on the employee. In cases of reverse discrimination, employees in New Jersey state courts and many federal courts had to satisfy the “Background Circumstances Rule,” which requires that the employee prove that he “has been victimized by the unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.” However, in 2025, the United States Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Background Circumstances Rule in Title VII cases in the case of Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services.
New Jersey Lawyers Blog





Education.

New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Extech Building Materials, Inc. vs. E&N Construction, Inc., explaining the requirements of an enforceable personal guaranty under New Jersey contract law. The main element is that the guarantor must clearly and unambiguously express its intent to personally guarantee the third-party’s obligation.