New Jersey Consumer Fraud Damages and Attorneys Fees in Construction Projects Examined by Appeals Court
New Jersey construction law incorporates the damages provisions of the Consumer Fraud Act in residential home improvement construction projects. A New Jersey appeals court recently analyzed the recovery of triple damages and attorneys fees in construction projects under the Consumer Fraud Act, and personal liability for contractors, in two construction law decisions.
Background
Philip Dattolo hired EMC Squared, LLC to construct a new single-family home in Boonton, New Jersey. They signed a written contract. Toward the end of the project, Dattolo selected several
additional items to be included. A written change order to the original signed contract was drafted, but the change order was never signed. In January 2020 the home passed final inspections, and EMC’s owner, Edward Morgan, advised Dattolo that he could not continue working on the project. Dattolo refused to pay “one additional cent,” and complained that there were numerous construction defects which would cost him thousands of dollars to remediate.
New Jersey Lawyers Blog


law.
the project, such as the engineer or the architect. Owners may also make these claims against architects and engineers directly. A trial judge in the 
litigation process, but still provide an enforceable dispute resolution process.
but not including any order requiring the taking of emergency measures….” This is an important tool under New Jersey
agreed to and then not get paid, despite the fact that they met all the project’s specifications and did a great job. It is a well-founded worry. Companies or people who don’t want to pay devise many different schemes, sometimes claiming defects with the work, delay damages, failure to do proper paperwork, the excuses are as varied as is human imagination. To be clear, sometimes these claims are legitimate, but sometimes they are not, and good contractors need to get paid to do the work and to stay in business.
actors and building suppliers in the prosecution and defense of construction lien claims.
Disputes over construction projects can be costly, time-consuming, complex and unpredictable endeavors. Arbitration is a mechanism often used to avoid these pitfalls by many in New Jersey construction law. Attorneys from our firm have significant experience in litigating and arbitrating construction disputes. One of the most contentious areas is whether a dispute is subject to arbitration or whether it may be litigated in court. Even more complex is trying to figure out which parts, if any, are covered by an arbitration in multi-issue disputes. New Jersey’s courts recently faced just this problem and issued an important precedential decision.