New Jersey Supreme Court Limits Non-disparagement Agreements in Settlement of Discrimination Lawsuits
New Jersey employment lawsuits alleging discrimination, harassment or retaliation are often resolved in settlement agreements. The New Jersey Supreme Court recently clarified the
permissible scope of non-disparagement agreements in those settlement agreements in the case of Savage v. Township of Neptune.
Background
Christine Savage was a police officer with the Neptune Township Police Department. She filed a lawsuit against the Department and certain individuals in 2013 alleging that they violated the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination by sexually harassing her, discriminating against her because of her gender, and retaliating against her because of her complaints of discrimination. The lawsuit was settled in 2014. As part of the settlement the Township agreed to give Savage access to training and promote her to sergeant.
New Jersey Lawyers Blog


decision has significant implications for how employees should handle allegations of misconduct and resulting discipline.
nepotism, politics, discrimination, whistleblower retaliation, cronyism, or outright bribery. Since the entire purpose of the New Jersey Civil Service System is to ensure that hiring is based on merit, there is an appeal process for applicants who believe that their name was improperly removed from a Civil Service hiring or promotion list.
These effects impact both
New Jersey appellate decision in the case of
the civil service system, do not enjoy.
found to have abandoned her position she may be involuntarily terminated. Thus, the right to appeal these characterizations is important.
protect the rights of applicants while ensuring that they are able to provide the vital public services of their prospective positions.
jurisdictions which have not adopted civil service do not enjoy. Most government employment decisions which do not involve