State Cannot Prohibit Government Employee From Discussing Investigations of Harassment and Discrimination Complaints
The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination prohibits discrimination and harassment in the workplace. The New Jersey Civil Service Commission published a regulation incorporating
this requirement. However, in the case of Savchenko v. State of New Jersey, the New Jersey Supreme Court found that a portion of this regulation which requested that parties and witnesses keep the investigation confidential had a chilling effect on free speech. It therefore struck down that portion of the regulation.
Background
The Civil Service Commission understandably seeks to maintain the confidentiality of these investigations, as publication might discourage witnesses from assisting, and victims from coming forward. The regulation therefore contained a provision which provided that:
New Jersey Lawyers Blog


permissible scope of non-disparagement agreements in those settlement agreements in the case of
decision has significant implications for how employees should handle allegations of misconduct and resulting discipline.
nepotism, politics, discrimination, whistleblower retaliation, cronyism, or outright bribery. Since the entire purpose of the New Jersey Civil Service System is to ensure that hiring is based on merit, there is an appeal process for applicants who believe that their name was improperly removed from a Civil Service hiring or promotion list.
These effects impact both
New Jersey appellate decision in the case of
the civil service system, do not enjoy.
found to have abandoned her position she may be involuntarily terminated. Thus, the right to appeal these characterizations is important.
protect the rights of applicants while ensuring that they are able to provide the vital public services of their prospective positions.