In a recent New Jersey employment law decision regarding disability discrimination and employer’s duty to provide reasonable accommodations for disabled employees, a New Jersey appeals court explained in the case of Gould v. New Jersey Department of Transportation the requirement for employers to engage in a good faith “interactive process” with their disabled employees to determine what reasonable accommodations can be provided to allow the employee to continue working.
Background
Leroy Gould worked for the New Jersey Department of Transportation from 2001 until he retired in 2021. He was a transit planner and coordinator, coordinating bus and rail service. In 2012, Gould was diagnosed with prostate cancer, undergoing surgery and radiation which caused incontinence. As a result, he usually had to go to the restroom immediately upon arrival to work. He drove to a main parking lot, then took an employee van to his office building; the drop-off point was only a two-minute walk, which worked fine. He was allowed to wear jeans because the fabric soaked up urine quickly and prevented rashes, and he received a standup desk because of vascular issues.
New Jersey Lawyers Blog


Tax”. Pursuant to the prior legislation, adopted in 2004, residential properties and certain commercial properties which sold for over $1 million in New Jersey were subject to a “Mansion Tax” which required the buyers of the real estate to pay 1 percent of the purchase price to the State of New Jersey.
other party’s customers or clients after the expiration of the contract.
government. She worked closely with the Department’s supervisors. Clients were sent by Department to the Center. The Center would assign clients to Bodner. She assessed clients to see if they had substance abuse issues and if so to recommend the appropriate level of care, and report them to the case workers. She would conference cases with Department case workers.
they must be paid. The Supreme Court of New Jersey considered whether and under what circumstances “commissions” are considered “wages” protected by the Wage Payment Law.
thinking about filing a lawsuit for tortious interference without competent evidence.
strongest employee protection laws in the country.